What Will You Learn
Attendees will gain a working understanding of the generative AI landscape in legal practice, including the distinctions between general-purpose and legal-specific tools and the oversight each demands. Through detailed hypotheticals, attorneys will learn to spot ethical issues arising from AI-assisted drafting, supervision failures, and hallucinated citations and will leave with a clear grasp of what the Model Rules, ABA guidance, and their jurisdiction's bar opinions now require.
What Will You Gain
Attorneys will leave equipped to make defensible decisions about when and how to deploy generative AI, with the ethical guardrails already built in. They will walk away with practical tools for evaluating AI products, structuring supervision protocols, implementing firm-wide policies, and complying with the rapidly evolving patchwork of court disclosure requirements that now govern AI use in practice.
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Closed-captioning available
Alison A. Grounds, eMerge Managing Partner | Troutman eMerge
Alison A. Grounds is the founder and Managing Partner of Troutman eMerge, a wholly owned subsidiary of Troutman Pepper Locke that delivers end-to-end, integrated discovery services and data management consulting for legal matters. Combining deep litigation experience with a practical, efficiency-focused approach, Alison helps clients across industries leverage data effectively, reduce costs, and manage the legal and technical risks that arise at the intersection of discovery, technology, and artificial intelligence. She advises clients on all aspects of discovery-related litigation, internal and governmental investigations, subpoena response, due diligence, and proactive litigation readiness, including the deployment and integration of AI in litigation workflows. She also serves as national discovery counsel for clients managing large portfolios of related matters, ensuring consistent, defensible approaches to eDiscovery across cases.
Education & Credentials
Recognition & Leadership
Professional Involvement
Experience
David M. Stauss, Partner | Troutman Pepper Locke
David M. Stauss is a Partner in the Privacy + Cyber practice at Troutman Pepper Locke, where he advises clients on the full spectrum of state, federal, and international privacy, cybersecurity, and AI law. Recognized by Chambers USA for his ability to provide actionable guidance both in the moment and for long-term planning, David works with clients across their organizational life cycle — helping them understand and comply with rapidly evolving legal requirements, leading comprehensive responses to cybersecurity incidents, and advising on privacy considerations in transactions. His counseling encompasses U.S. comprehensive state privacy laws such as the California Consumer Privacy Act, children’s privacy and social media laws, data broker statutes, biometric and health information privacy laws, AI laws and regulations including the Colorado AI Act, and international frameworks including the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation.
Education & Credentials
Recognition & Leadership
Professional Involvement
Experience
Jessica Kozlov Davis, Chief Intake and Conflicts Officer | Troutman Pepper Locke
Jessica Kozlov Davis serves as Chief Intake and Conflicts Officer at Troutman Pepper Locke, where she leads the Intake and Conflicts Services Department and holds a seat on the firm’s Office of General Counsel. In that role, she advises the firm’s attorneys on professional responsibility and ethics-related matters across a range of practice contexts, including issues arising from the use of artificial intelligence.
Education & Credentials
Professional Involvement
Experience
Jennifer M. Doran, Senior Attorney | Troutman eMerge
Jennifer M. Doran is a Senior Attorney on the Troutman eMerge team, based in the firm’s Chicago office. In her practice, Jennifer applies extensive experience in eDiscovery, information governance, and data protection with a focused emphasis on complex litigation and government investigations. She advises case teams on best practices and collaborates directly with attorneys to develop and deploy strategies designed to achieve each client’s specific goals and outcomes. Jennifer excels in leveraging technology, including artificial intelligence, to understand data and maximize efficiency across every phase of fact gathering and analysis, from initial case assessment through the identification of the most effective evidence for trial.
Education & Credentials
Professional Involvement
Experience
I. Welcome, Objectives & Framing | 12:00pm – 12:05pm
This opening session launches the speaker panel and establishes the program’s four core priorities: Building a practical AI framework, understanding ethics and court rules, meeting client obligations, and implementing risk mitigation strategies. Attendees leave with a clear roadmap for the hour and a firm grasp of why generative AI demands immediate professional attention from every practicing attorney.
II. AI in Legal Practice: Tools, Trends, and Firm Use | 12:05pm – 12:15pm
This segment surveys the current generative AI landscape in legal practice, drawing a critical distinction between general-purpose consumer tools and legal-specific platforms, and examining how Troutman Pepper Locke has structured its AI Hub and Athena platform around firm-wide training and policy requirements. A live audience poll invites attendees to reflect on their own current AI use and situate their practice within the broader adoption landscape.
III. Hypothetical 1 – “Complaint Craft” (Drafting with AI: Ethics, Privacy & Courts) | 12:15pm – 12:30pm
Working through a scenario in which an attorney uses AI to draft multiple complaints incorporating client and patient data, this session delivers hands-on issue spotting across privacy, security, confidentiality, court rules, and client-specific requirements. Speakers examine data handling obligations, the critical differences between free and enterprise AI products, vendor due diligence responsibilities, court-imposed sanctions tied to AI-generated filings, and the ABA and state bar ethics rules that govern every stage of AI-assisted drafting.
IV. Hypothetical 2 – “Your Virtual Associate” (Supervision, Candor & Court Policies) | 12:30pm – 12:50pm
This session works through a scenario in which co-counsel uses generative AI to improve a brief and hallucinated citations are discovered, using a live poll to explore responsibility allocation and sanctions exposure for supervising counsel. Speakers apply Model Rules 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 to the supervision and competence obligations at play, survey court policies on generative AI use, and extend the analysis to AI-assisted memos, paralegal use, client self-use of AI, and the emerging ethical challenges posed by agentic AI systems and digital twins.
V. Reducing AI Risk & Key Takeaways | 12:50pm – 1:00pm
The closing segment delivers practical, human-centered strategies for safe AI use in legal work, covering the institutional controls, written policies, approved tool lists, documented workflows, and training requirements, that protect attorneys and clients alike. Speakers address jurisdiction-specific ethics considerations, leaving attendees with a concrete, actionable framework for integrating generative AI responsibly into their practice.